We've lost another friend to cancer this week. We understand he felt it was time to go. I live in the Netherlands where "where and when to die" is a legal choice. The government protects those less scrupled persons from forcing the issue for inheritance or whatever reasons by mandating the signature of two doctors who agree nothing more can be done for the person's medical condition; who support the patient's wish to die.
I throw this out there for readers. Maybe you disagree stipulating: This is eternal business and the medical community should have nothing to say in the matter. Maybe you agree: The choice should be that of the individual and his medical team who prefer to let the person 'die with dignity'. I haven't had to face this choice yet personally or with a member of my own family.
I have thought that if we didn't let our beloved family member and pet suffer, then our human family should receive at least the same consideration. But I think this is highly personal issue. I do believe that it MUST be the choice of the individual. There should be no pressure or foisting on the patient to concede to anyone's wishes.
However, this always raises questions such as 1) is the person in his/her right mind? 2) What if there is a medical treatment and cure--traditional or complimentary--that would work for the person and the answer is in next email? 3) What about religious and other considerations about death, dying and the hour?
I am a theologian (at least I studied and possess an MA in Theology), but this is one issue I leave up to God and the individual who will face his/her ultimate destiny. Not for me to judge. I am responsible for my own life decisions. Right now that seems enough.
In Peace and Clarity of Thought.
LankaBlue2
