Saturday, June 14, 2014

Success and the (hu) Man of Values

There are any number of quotable quotes, mantras and mnemonic devices for SUCCESS. Here’s a typical one:

SUCCESS
See your goal
Understand the obstacles
Create a positive mental picture
Clear your mind of self doubt
Embrace Challenge
Stay on track
Show the world you can do it.*

There’s nothing wrong with this formula. However, this quote—and others like it—fail to define success. So what is success?  Is Success

the number of degree titles after your name?
the amount of money you’ve earned?
the worth of your stock portfolio?
the new Mercedes, Bentley or Harley you drive/ride?
the six figure salary you earn?

The problem here is that success is measured in ‘things’ gotten, gained, achieved—the (supposed) outward symbols of success. The Oxford English dictionary defines success as, “the accomplishment of an aim or purpose”. Certainly a worthy aim or purpose can be a degree, a car, a good paying job or “fame, wealth, or social status”. The ditty above proposes a formula to guide us to the goal, to achieve success.

However, glancing at the “archaic” definition of this word proves interesting. In the 16th century, success is defined by the OED as the “good or bad outcome of an undertaking”. It comes from the Latin meaning “to come close after”. This is some word evolution! From a “good or bad outcome of an undertaking”, to “come close”, success has come to mean “attaining things such as fame, wealth, and social status”.

What if you don’t own a Mercedes? Your portfolio, your retirement fund, your 401K, hit rock bottom in the economic downturn or through a Bernie Madoff-like swindle? Perhaps you couldn’t afford studying at a prestigious university; maybe you didn’t qualify for a scholarship or had to work 3 jobs just to put food on the table? What if the company squandered your pension in a high stake derivatives game or mergers that failed? The job you love, ‘outsourced’? The company downsized and you with it? The bank foreclosed on ‘your dream’, with little understanding or empathy for a repayment schedule? And the MA/MBA/PhD on which you counted didn’t produce the job of your dreams?

In a world where SUCCESS is judged on the make and model of one’s car, one’s title, social prestige or a six figure income, how can we feel successful if we ‘fail’ to meet ‘the’ standard—attaining fame, wealth and social status? How can we feel good about our choices, our achievements, accomplishments or the time invested in working toward our goals?

I am not pleading for sackcloth and ashes, neither a steady diet of dry bread and water. On the contrary, working hard can and should have its reward—that’s the ‘visceral’ meaning of success. But if the reward doesn’t measure up to the accepted social standard of success then what? How can we feel successful when the things that ‘should have been’—the things for which we created a positive mental picture, embraced the challenge, stayed on track, showed the world we could do it—offer no brass ring or reward at the end of the day?

Perhaps we should return to the ‘archaic’ meaning of success—a meaning in which ‘. . . the good or bad outcome’ is success. In the moment, we may think the ‘bad outcome’, the one that ‘got away’, represents complete failure—our failure to achieve world renown, to make the superior income, to affirm the social standard.

Reframing is the key. Ask yourself: When did you last reward yourself for ‘nearly’ achieving the goal? For coming in second? For having worked extremely hard for the goal? For doing the right thing, irrespective of outcome or consequence? Rewarding yourself for the effort, for doing well—learning for inherent joy in the process?

Rating and defining success in terms of things which can be measured reflects an evolution in the term’s meaning. Clearly, there has to be more to success than the measurement of things we have or don’t have. 

Defining success in terms of values is a start: Values like ‘the greater good’, doing ‘for the other regardless of outcome’, having a ‘bad outcome’ in the moment, only to reap the rewards later in deferred gratification. Better yet, what if success is marked by NOT making IT, whatever IT might be?  

Defining success as the journey, the growth, and the processes we’ve uncovered in knowing ourselves and others can change our perspective on a host of life losses and gains.

Let’s define success in terms of ‘intangibles’ rather than the latest sport car, diamond ring or six-figure income. There’s nothing wrong with dreaming and striving for the goal. But success can not—alone—be about reaching the end product.

I hope you are successful however you define success, to whatever you put your mind. Here’s a quote from a great mind that—by any definition of success—succeeded!
Try not to become a man of success,          
but rather try to become a man of values. *

I’ll edit Albert Einstein to say ‘human’. He, too, would agree: Success—no matter how it is defined—is a journey not marked by collected things.

*http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/topics/topic_success.html

**(http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/success). 

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Just a short note--I can't believe it's been a year since my last post! Been busy, but that's no excuse ;D Much has happened, but I continue to enjoy teaching, researching, counselling and continuing education (and we know that only ends at death ;-)
Been to a wonderful conference in Malta using Adlerian principles with an integrated approach. We talked about the integrated approach this summer in the Cross Cultural Psychology course I taught. There are many good things to the Adlerian perspective and I hope to be using it more as time goes in with my clients and in my teaching.

My best to you few who follow this blog. I'd better do better!
In Peace.
Lankablue2

2013 An Posting

Wow! It has been a very long time since posting. As is fitting with my new position-- a wee business consisting of myself--I need to 'promote'. This is antithetical to my nature.

My business is mental health, counselling, lecturing and learning. This is a new phase in life. I've never had a business before and realise my nature rebels against the traditional business model. I say traditional, but am not sure it actually is a 'tradition'.

We've all been rather shocked at what 'business had done' in these last years. But as I've been studying, writing lectures and discussing with students the 'Ethics of Business', I realise there is a laudable 'business ethic'.

In class, we are discussing values, mores, morality as concepts: Concepts I rarely think businesses as having except to market deceptively and gain our hard earned cash by convincing us that we can not 'live' without their latest & greatest 'product'.

The Introduction to Management text I used for this section of my course--which I've never used or taught before--surprised me! There are 'real values', a positive sense of morality, a desire to see good as a business outcome in the world.  Go figure!

Actually, this shouldn't surprise us. There are those who, though making a living--a great living--also believe in helping their fellow humans. Ben & Jerry's, The Body Shop are just two businesses which come to mind.

The wonderful thing about a sound business ethic is that giving back to the community and to others has its rewards--personally and financially. It seems, however, by the time our students leave the sacred halls of ivy, they've forgotten this.

Or--and this is what I really suspect--the environment in which they must work, drives this positive ethic underground. Then we have the 'dwarf throwing contests' and other insensitive, money wasting, over-the-top activities done by business because 'we can'; because 'who's going to stop us?'.

Here's my hope for this term and for many terms to come: That my students walk away with their business degrees and their ethic intact; that rather than succumb they overcome and lead the way forward, like Ben, like Jerry, like the Body Shop. This IS a generation that can. I wish them every success!

In Peace: LankaBlue2 aka LankaBlueToo


Thursday, August 9, 2012

Choice, Religious Coping & Therapy

Whose Choice?

Choice is often about control and decision making. Do I choose? Am I being forced to choose? Is someone else 'choosing for me'? Am I choosing for myself or for my family? Am I choosing for the good of the whole or the good of the individual, i.e., me? And what are the ramifications of my choices?

Related to the issue of choice is the issue of control. Who's got control? Is it me? Do I feel in control? Do I feel out of control? Do I feel someone else is in control? And what are the consequences of the 'control issue' if I'm not in control and someone else is?

In Western psychology, we talk about locus of control. What's that you ask? Here's a good definition:
       “A locus of control orientation is a belief about whether the outcomes of our         actions are contingent on what we do (internal control orientation) or on     events outside our personal control (external control orientation)”, Zimbardo, 1985.

In other words when we act, do we believe we are in control? Or do we believe we act because we are controlled by things outside ourselves?

In the East, we seem to have an external control orientation or so it appears to me—our orientation comes not from within, but without. The gods, the fates, the family, a class or caste system; millennia of cultural history weigh on us and often we feel we are not in control of our lives.

Not everyone, but many think these things control our fate, our destiny; who we become, and so on. And yet I think we try to balance our sense of choice with all these opposing forces to develop; to become the person we want to be if we think things through; if we examine the evidence for or against our actions. Of course, I noticed this same principle in the West as well.

So, perhaps it’s not an issue of East or West; rather beliefs, whether East or West.
This brings me to a topic dear to my heart & research—The Psychology of Religious Coping.

I am a huge fan of Prof Dr Kenneth Pargament who is a leading practitioner-psychologist-researcher in the field of religious coping. What his research found—and not alone his as this field has come into its own in the last twenty years—is that people developed three approaches. These are a Collaborative Style, in which we co-operate with (a) God to deal with stressful events in life; a Deferring Style, in which we leave everything to (a) God; and a Self-Directed Style, in which we do not rely on (a) God and try to solve problems by ourselves.

Pargament discovered many other things as well, but these three styles apply across the boundaries of religious experience, whether Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, Christian or Jew. (Buddhism is a non-theistic religion but tell that to those who pray to Lord Buddha in Bangkok, Beijing and Boralesgamuwa!).

In my own study, survivors of great distress (such as tsunami, civil war, and so on) find solace and comfort in the positive use of their religious beliefs regardless of belief systems (c.f., E. Leembruggen-Kallberg, Psychotraumatology vis-à-vis Religious & Spiritual Beliefs: A Sri Lankan Case Study).

Whether survivors of great catastrophes felt ‘in control’ of their circumstances or ‘acted upon’ by others—the fates, a government out of control, vicious neighbours, kith and kin, or even God—as they meditated, prayed, chanted, and ‘acted’, they gained control over their feelings of helplessness, victim-hood and their position as the ‘other’—not in control. Here we find religion working “functionally”, i.e., religion helping the individual “to cope with death, provide meaning to life, provide moral absolutes and overcome existential alienation” (Paloutzian, 1996).

This is the positive side of religious coping. To be sure, there is a negative side. And this, too, must be addressed. But as a counselling therapist, it is good to know that religious experience and one’s spirituality can be used in gaining positive outcomes for better mental health.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Trying to figure out what's going on with blogging these days at Google. Of course, I got a note in Dutch about updating my site. Sorry dear reader. I've been too lax ;D Now that I've more time, I hope to write more frequently, if I don't lose my space, which I believe was the import of the Dutch message. ORRRRR it was a spoof and someone wants my details. If you've and idea, please let me know in the comment section.  Meanwhile . . .

Life goes on. I am counselling, have set up my own practice at my home. I also counsel at Webster University and I continue to teach at Webster University, Leiden and Azusa-Windesheim @ Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. I love working with college students and enjoy what I do immensely. It keeps me 'barely' employed, but that's really not the point ;D

I'm going to try to figure out what's going on and I hope to write more now that there's sometime to do it! Wishing you well.

In Peace. LankaBlue2

Saturday, November 26, 2011

New Look Blog

Since I have a new look, I thought I ought to write something! I'm completing another term teaching in Leiden. I have really enjoyed the students. They are bright, cosmopolitan and creative. As we are winding down the semester, I find I'm going to miss them!

This is the great thing about being a teacher, lecturer, prof! Sharing ideas is THE best experience. Seeing students become enthusiastic about ideas, vying to express their opinions, jostling one another for the last word is just electric. Yesterday's class was exactly that--electric. Ideas literally sizzled! These are the days when 'they' can't pay me enough to teach.

Bravo FRSH Seminaar 1200! You're a wonderful group!

LankaBlue2